Electric Propulsion

Electric Propulsion

Free Molecular Electro Jet

Introduction

Nano satellites, typically weighing between 1 and 10 kg, require very minute forces for executing accurate maneuvers for station keeping, orbital corrections, and possibly attitude control. These forces are often of the order of several micronewtons or less. With the reducing scales of size and weight, the constraints on the propulsive devices have rendered conventional chemical/ion thrusters unsuitable, mandating very lightweight microthrusters which occupy the smallest possible footprint. Typical power budgets available for nano-satellite propulsion sub-systems are of the order of a few watts, while allowing no more than a few hundreds of grams. Several competing technologies, (cold-gas thrusters, pulsed plasma thruster, Free Molecular Micro Resistojet (FMMR), Hall thrusters), have been proposed to fulfill this need. However, each of these technologies has certain limitation vis-à-vis the nature of thrust, efficiency, power and weight. Cold-gas thrusters exhibit the lowest specific impulse (Isp ~ 65 s) of all the options1, which translates into inefficient propellant usage causing significant payload penalty for long term missions. The pulsed plasma thruster, as the name suggests, only provides short and frequent ‘bursts’ of thrust called Impulse bits, instead of a continuous, steady thrust, a problem further compounded by its poor efficiency (~3%)2. The FMMR offers only marginal improvement over cold-gas microthrusters (Isp ~ 80-160 s), and suffers from significant energy losses due to thermal dissipation inherent in the working principle3. Miniaturized Hall thrusters suffer from rapid deterioration in efficiency due to geometry constraints and scaling effects in addition to high power requirements4.

 

Free Molecular Electro Jet (FMEJ)

The Free Molecular Electro Jet (FMEJ)5 is a new class of electric micro-thrusters for small satellites, with a wide array of applications ranging from orbit maintenance (e.g., drag compensation) to attitude control.This class of thrusters aims to provide a means to impart milli-Newton-seconds of impulse while keeping the power requirement to a minimum. The FMEJ is a proposed improvement over the existing Hall effect thrusters (HET), and the Free Molecular Micro Resistojet (FMMR). While miniature HETs require external magnetic field and upward of 100 watts power budget, the FMMR is an electro-thermal class of microthruster with tens of watt level power requirement. The proposed FMEJ design incorporates electro-hydro-dynamic flow acceleration techniques to increase the efficiency of energy transfer from the electrical source to the propellant, and is predicted to produce similar thrust with a lower power than needed for the FMMR.

Fig 1. Schematic of the FMEJ

 

Moreover, the presence of charged particles implies that both electric and magnetic fields can be used to improve thruster performance. As such, FMEJs are expected to have significant advantages in size, weight, and power (SWaP) as compared to their HET and FMMR counterparts. These demonstrated improvements would enable small satellite missions currently not possible due to the inability of existing propulsive systems to meet the stringent SWaP needs of small satellites. The basic idea behind the FMEJ concept involves embedding electrodes with an electric potential difference along the dielectric surface of the channel walls to produce a charged particle mixture called plasma. Similar to the dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) actuators, well known for atmospheric flow control, the charged particles in FMEJ channel are driven by the electric field imparting collisional momentum to the propellant in a desired direction by appropriate design and placement of electrodes. Figure 1 shows a schematic of one of the several possible arrangements of the device to explain the concept. The FMEJ channel [j1] cross-section is 1 cm x 2 mm x 2 mm. Such small foot print is desirable for small satellites where space and weight are at a premium. The physical working mechanism of the FMEJ is a proposed improvement over the existing free molecular micro resistojet (FMMR)3, where electrical energy is first converted into thermal energy by resistive heating, and then into kinetic energy of propellant molecules. In contrast, the FMEJ device convert the energy directly from electrical to kinetic, thus avoiding intermediate losses associated with thermal heating of the microthruster device. Moreover, the presence of charged particles implies that both electric and magnetic fields can be used to improve the performance of these thrusters. As such, the FMEJ is expected to have significant advantages in size, weigh, and power (SWaP) as compared to their HET and FMMR counterparts.

A.2 Physics of the FMEJ

The FMEJ operating principle involves the concepts of electrohydrodynamics (EHD) and plasma physics. Weakly ionized plasma is generated using either a dielectric barrier discharge, or conventional glow discharge, in a microchannel by applying a strong electric field. The region of ionization extends a finite distance away from the electrodes by the Townsend mechanism, enabling the interaction between ionized region and the bulk neutral region. This interaction takes the form of different types of collisions (elastic, inelastic, charge-exchange, ionizing), by which momentum is transferred from the charged particles to the neutrals.

The fluid flow in such a channel is governed by a set of partial differential equations known as the Navier Stokes equations, which put down the principle of conservation of mass, momentum, and energy in mathematical form. The physics of a plasma actuator may be expressed by the momentum conservation equation, presented below.

This equation relates the change in momentum of the fluid (LHS term) to various macro and micro level phenomena. Momentum loss in inelastic collision, changes in momentum by virtue of changing amount of a specie, and momentum diffusion resulting from pressure gradient are inherent to all fluid flows. The fourth term on the RHS captures the interaction of plasma with neutral fluid via collisions, which results in transfer of momentum from the charged species to the neutrals, resulting in an induced bulk velocity. Plasma discharges in such application are self-limiting by virtue of the phenomenon of charge deposition, which cancels the applied field locally, leading to the quenching of the plasma microdischarge filament. This self-limiting nature ensures the current and power drawn by a plasma actuator device do not exceed the system architecture limits.

Approach

Numerical

While various other embodiments are foreseeable, the FMEJ micro thruster was numerically simulated as a channel (see Fig. 1). Various numerical models are available to simulate plasma under the given conditions. These models differ in accuracy and computational cost. In order to numerically model the plasma, a two species fluid model was verified against reported 1-D and 2-D simulation results for plasma discharge between parallel plates.6 We employ an in-house multi-scale ionized gas (MIG) flow computational platform for these studies. MIG is primarily finite element based, is modular, and suitable for ready implementation for stiff multidimensional problems relevant for capturing the physics of FMEJ. This code was organically developed by the Subrata Roy and his group over the past 14 years and has been applied to solve both, plasma and gas dynamic problems at low and high pressures, and at macro and microscales for space propulsion and aerospace applications.7-9

The two species fluid model uses Local Mean Energy Approximation (LMEA) to model positive ions and electrons. From this plasma simulation, assuming the plasma is weakly couple with the gas, a body force and heat source are calculated in order to run a rarefied gas simulation using Navier-Stokes equations and slip boundary conditions that allows us to find the performance parameters of the micro-thruster.

Experimental

FIG. 2 APRG μNewton Thrust Stand

The experimental testing of the FMEJ concept involves several planned phases. In the first phase of the experimental work, conventional DBD actuators have been tested at pressures relevant to the FMEJ operation to assess their behavior in the free molecular regime. This includes thrust and power characterization of macroscale DBD actuators using a commercial O’Haus force balance as well has the indigenous μNTS.

 

To characterize the FMEJ device, a thrust stand capable of microNewton level resolution would be needed. APRG has built an in-house thrust stand capable of 0.1 μN resolution10,11. The thrust stand is essentially a torsion balance with a magnetic damper and fiber optic linear displacement sensor (Fig. 2). The thrust stand has been used to reliably characterize microactuators for measure microNewton-level forces at ambient pressures, thus validating its resolution12.

Relevant Preliminary Results

a. Results from Finite Element based Numerical Simulation

A preliminary simulation in 2-D using the two species plasma fluid model6 shows promising results. Table 1 shows the design parameters and the values obtained from the plasma simulation.13

 

Table 1. Design parameters of FMEJ

Parameter Value
Gas Pressure 100 Pa
Length 1 cm
Height 2 mm
Working Propellant Xenon
Potential Difference 50V
Anode Current 2.32-02 A
Anode Power 1.16 W
Total body Force (x-comp) 1.19E-03 N

 

Table 2. Comparison between FMMR and FMEJ

 

FMMR3

FMEJ15

Mass Flow Rate (kg/s)

3.0×10-06

3.1×10-06

Power (W)

3.2

1.16

Thrust (N)

1.7×10-03

1.7×10-03

Isp (s)

5.8×1001

5.6×10

Efficiency

0.15

0.40

In order to compare the device, literature review data is provided in Table 2 for FMMR and the results obtained for FMEJ using the body force distribution from the plasma simulation in a rarefied gas model. The preliminary result shows an increase of efficiency for FMEJ in comparison with FMMR with similar mass flow rates and specific impulses.

 

b. Results from Low Pressure Testing of DBD Actuators

FIG 3. Thrust and relative effectiveness for Teflon actuators of various thicknesses from Soni and Roy13 (APL 2013).

The results from the low pressure characterization of conventional macroscale DBD actuators have been promising. Figure 3 taken from Appl. Phys. Lett.14 plots the thrust and effectiveness trend for Teflon dielectric at difference thicknesses as a function of pressure. Results suggest that as the pressure goes down, thinner dielectrics undergo a higher force increase than thicker ones. Furthermore, thinner dielectrics demonstrate a higher increase in effectiveness than thicker ones, indicating a preference for thin dielectric to optimize power requirements. These trends suggest that further reduction in dielectric thickness may provide improved performance at the thrust levels needed for a microthruster.

 

References

 

  1.  J. Mueller, J. Ziemer, R. Hofer, R. Wirz, and T. O’Donnell, “A Survey of Micro-Thrust Propulsion Options for Microspacecraft and Formation Flying Missions”, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, April 9, (2008), 5’th Annual CubeSat Developers Workshop, San Luis Obispo, CA
  2. C. Rayburn, M. Campbell, W. A. Hoskins, R. J. Cassady,  “Development of a Micro Pulsed Plasma Thruster for the DAWGSTAR Nanosatellite”, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, and Primex Space Systems, Redmond, WA, AIAA-2000-3256
  3. A.D. Ketsdever, R.H. Lee, and T.C. Lilly, “Performance testing of a micro-fabricated propulsion system for nanosatellite applications,” Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, Vol.15,( 2005), pp. 2254-2263.
  4. N. Z. Warner, Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Hall Thruster Miniaturization, MIT PhD Thesis, (2007)
  5. Roy, S., “Method and Apparatus for Small Satellite Propulsion”. Published US Patent Application US20120304618 A1 dated December 6, (2012).
  6. I. Rafatov et. al, “On the accuracy and reliability of different fluid models of the direct current glow discharge,” Phys. Plasmas 19, 033502 (2012).
  7. S. Roy and B.P. Pandey, “Modeling low pressure collisional plasma sheath with space-charge effect,” Physics of  Plasma, Vol.10, Num.6, (2003), pp. 2578- 2585.
  8. J.D. Huba, “NRL Plasma Formulary,” Plasma Physics Division, Naval Research Lab, Washington, DC, 2009.
  9. J. M. Fife, “Two-Dimensional Hybrid Particle-In-Cell Modeling of Hall Thruster,” Master of Science Dissertation, Aeronautics and Astronautics Dept., Massachusetts Institute of Tech., MA, 1983.
  10. J. Soni and S. Roy, “Design of a microNewton thrust stand for low pressure characterization of DBD actuators,” AIAA-2013-0755, 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Grapevine, TX, 7-11 Jan, (2013).
  11. J. Soni and S. Roy, “Design and characterization of a nano-Newton thrust stand”, Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 84, No. 9, 2013.
  12. J. Zito, R. Durscher, J. Soni, S. Roy and D. Arnold, “Flow and Force Inducement Using Micro Size Dielectric Barrier Discharge Actuators”, Applied Physics Letters, 100, 193502, 2012
  13. A. Blanco and S. Roy, “Numerical Simulation of a Free Molecular Electro Jet (FMEJ) for In-Space Propulsion”, AIAA-2013-0208, 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Grapevine, TX, 7-11 Jan, (2013).
  14. J. Soni and S. Roy, Low pressure characterization of dielectric barrier discharge actuators, App. Phys. Let., 102, 112908 (2013).